Tuesday, April 25, 2023

"The Human Condition" A Story of Grace

I recently received a podcast via text with the suggestion I should listen to and consider its contents. It consisted of an interview between a prominent atheist podcaster and a former Christian minister and missionary turned atheist concerning the content of his new book. It demonstrates the vast difference between how Christians read the Bible and how non-believers read the Bible. (The term "non-believer" in this post will be defined as anyone outside the border of Orthdox Christianity) The podcast was just over an hour long and carried various streams of thought. The one I have chosen to focus on here is found in the account recorded in Numbers chapter 16. Korah and his followers are found in rebellion against Moses and Aaron's leadership. The judgment which followed is what the podcasters took issue with.   

Numbers 16:31-35 ESV

(31)  And as soon as he had finished speaking all these words, the ground under them split apart.

(32)  And the earth opened its mouth and swallowed them up, with their households and all the people who belonged to Korah and all their goods.

(33)  So they and all that belonged to them went down alive into Sheol, and the earth closed over them, and they perished from the midst of the assembly.

(34)  And all Israel who were around them fled at their cry, for they said, “Lest the earth swallow us up!”

(35)  And fire came out from the LORD and consumed the 250 men offering the incense.

In the reading of the Bible, the pod-casters charge God's character using words such as being a jealous, proud, petty, unjust, unforgiving control freak, a vindictive ,homophobic racist, infanticidal, capricious, malevolent bully among other very descriptive adjectives. They derive this opinion from such scriptures as the one mentioned above. An attentive reading of the above text reveals a bad day for a lot of folks. Whole families perished that day, children and all, it was a very grim scene. But was it deserved? The pod-casters say no.   God is a bully and unjust in the fabricated story.  Christians sometimes are embarrassed by these accounts of God's judgment and feel they have to soften Him up somehow in their presentation of Jesus to persuade the non-believer God really is not like that now.  

The reality is God never intended to be softened up and the God present before Korah and the thousands that perished that day has not changed. The non-believer will very soon meet the same fate as Korah and the rest, whole families will fall under the displeasure and judgment of an Almighty and jealous God! All their charges of injustice will be as nothing, they will join Korah and those like him who are still suffering the consequences of their rebellion. It is a misconception to think those in hell would repent if given another chance. They hated God and the concept of God and religion, but that has not changed and will not change. I use the term concept of God because atheists don't believe in the reality of God, so it must be the concept of a deity they deem so harmful. As to Korah and his group, they are still spewing out their hatred of God and if they could be relieved of their torment would continue to do so.  The Bible was not given to us to present a mushy easy-going god that just loves everybody and everything and wants to make everything ok. The Bible was given to us so that we might obtain a very small glimpse of this infinite Being called Yahweh.

It is given that we might know what we are in contrast to this Being and the consequences of that contrast. The non-believer accepts none of this, in their reasoning man is basically good at heart, though they accept the fact he is not perfect, in most cases, his good outweighs his bad. The good he does earns him respect and his bad, if bad enough, can be repaid through judicial means and men's courts. The concept of accountability to a supreme divine perfect Being and the consequences of that is a repulsive thought. 

What are we to think concerning an infinite Being of an eternal existence possessing infinite perfection? Knowing our own corrupted thoughts, are we to imagine such a Being to allow such creatures as ourselves to exist in His creation? This is why the concept of such a God is so repulsive to many. They rather think we are deserving of some kind of existence without such accountability. The God of the Bible gives no such existence, what little existence we are afforded here whether good or bad by our experience, is pure mercy on the part of the creator. The fact Korah and his thousands in the account here in question were allotted any time at all to repent is pure Mercy. What the non-believer charges as cruel injustice were a demonstration of the enormous Mercy of God. The fact Moses and the others were afforded a means by which they could covenant and forgo such judgment was even greater Mercy. The non-believer's concept and understanding of God is too human, therefore they are unable to see the wonder in such scriptures as the one here. 

The difficulty is in our understanding of the relation between the infinite and the finite. Perfect justice demands perfect judgment, how can a finite being answer to the judgment of infinite justice when offended? It simply cannot, it stands forever condemned even for the slightest breach of imperfection. It is asked, why doesn't God just forgive if He is so good? Because He is also perfectly just, and if that justice goes unanswered it is no longer justice and God is no longer perfect. The justice must be answered! It is in that answer we find that the whole redemptive story of the Bible consummates in the Gospel. Judging from a human perspective, to condemn a man to death for picking up sticks on a Sabbath is cruel and unjust. (Numbers 15:32-36) It would be if it were a human law with a beginning and fashioned from finite human reason. But what if it was an eternal law fashioned from an eternal thought in an infinite God established for an eternal purpose and you as a finite man disrespected it and counted it as nothing? Even the understanding of the greatest theologian cannot plumb the depths of that scenario. 

It is difficult for the non-believer to understand the biblical doctrine of Total Depravity. They look at the world and see good and bad people around them, mostly good. They see themselves mostly in the good group, the bad when bad enough and caught, are put away to pay for their bad and hopefully learn to be good. Even the Bible speaks in this mode of human understanding in its communication. However, it also speaks from the divine mode as well to reveal the reality of the human experience. We find Paul speaking in this manner in Romans when examining the human condition.

Romans 3:10-12 ESV
(10)  as it is written: “None is righteous, no, not one;
(11)  no one understands; no one seeks for God.
(12)  All have turned aside; together they have become worthless; no one does good, not even one.”

This perception we have of good arises from our viewing the world using the human scale. The reality of the human condition escapes us using this scale. The doctrine of Total Depravity describes man as being affected in the totality of his being by the fall of Adam. This totality is seen in varying degrees in the human race, however, its depths are seen and experienced more in some than others, yet all aspects of man are affected. For some the depravity only erupts in their thoughts, in others, it reaches greater depths and is put into action. In other words, in one man it may show up as a lustful thought but is kept to himself and restrained, but in another, it is allowed to mature into adultery or rape. From our perspective, we view this as good and bad, but from the divine perspective, there is only evil and worthlessness as described by Paul above in Romans.

It is from this human perspective the non-believer takes issues with God's governance concerning the human condition throughout its history. Whenever a divine law was given, man found himself totally unable to keep it. However, the non-believer takes notice of such commands to the nation of Israel concerning the buying of slaves (Leviticus 25:44) and concludes he instituted the enslavement of men and charges Him with bigotry and abuse. The reality is laws such as this that we find in the Bible are simply God's governance of depraved humanity. He provides laws and instructions for the treatment of slaves, because the reality is, the depraved state of the human condition leaves no chance the condition of slavery will not exist. Take for instance the laws concerning divorce. 

Matthew 19:7-8 ESV
(7)  They said to him, “Why then did Moses command one to give a certificate of divorce and to send her away?”
(8)  He said to them, “Because of your hardness of heart Moses allowed you to divorce your wives, but from the beginning it was not so.

Was God supporting divorce by giving a command to do so? Absolutely not, but it was a law given to govern man's own depravity. Was God supporting slavery by commanding such laws? Absolutely not, for it was not so from the beginning, He was governing the human condition. None of these things strike the non-believer as anything more than inconsistent religious babel. However, to one who is regenerated, it is a marvelous wonder to see God's providence throughout redemptive history take such depravity of mind and use it and turn it all to fulfill His divine purpose in the Gospel. God uses man's own sin and depravity to bring about man's own salvation and deliverance to the Glory of Christ! Even the first man Adam in his sin, God turned and used to accomplish His eternal purpose in the Gospel. Had Adam not sinned but maintained under the covenant of works, we would still be living outside of grace with our position before Yahweh still depending upon our own ability to obey perfectly. In the Gospel, this failure is turned into the glorious position under grace whereupon our place and standing before Yahweh is eternal and secure by the work of another, Jesus Christ our Lord. We now stand before God in Him, our righteousness is not our own, but that of another! All of human history is but a story unfolding throughout the ages, revealing man's utter failure to obtain any lasting good. God's moral law came to reveal man's sin in a greater light, and God's civil laws came to curb and restrain man's sin. It was all to point the human race to grace by faith and grant him acceptance into God's pleasure. Oh, what wonder is revealed in Scripture as seen in this redemptive history! 

To God be the Glory!

David

Friday, February 3, 2023

The Miracles

 

I remember watching "The Ten Commandments" with Moses being played by Charlton Heston. After the movie, one was almost convinced Charlton Heston was Moses. The movie debuted in 1956 and was an amazing film for the time. Although sporting some Biblical inaccuracies and considerable freedom taken for the storyline, the Exodus story was vividly brought to life on the big screen. As popular as it was, we didn't see very many folks after the movie claiming to be able to divide the Red sea. However, that is not the case with the New Testament miracles. In the previous five series posts, I have written a number of arguments in favor of Cessationism in contrast to Pentecostalism and the movement that began at the turn of the 20th Century. As an extension to those articles, I want to take a look at the miracles in the New Testament and what Pentecostalism claims is still operating within the frame of Christianity. 

In over 25 years of traveling in the Pentecostal / Word of Faith churches, I have seen people lying on the floor supposedly slain by the power of God. I have seen adults and children dancing in aisles supposedly being inspired by the Holy Spirit, one particular form of this dancing was tagged by the critics as "the bunny hop". I have seen people run around in the church and even run out of the church supposedly under the power of the Holy Spirit. I have seen people who were prayed for with allergies, back pain, soreness, stiffness of joints, etc, with testimonies following of some measure of healing. There were a number of people who had cancer prayed for over the years that later died from the disease. I personally prayed for a blind man to be healed while at work one day. As far as I know, if he is still alive, he is still blind. A few in wheelchairs were prayed for but no one got out of their wheelchair. In one large Kenneth Hagin meeting I was in, about 6,000 were in attendance, I heard Kenneth Hagin say during one of his sermons he felt like someone needed to get out of a wheelchair. In the line of wheelchairs off to the side of the platform, someone stood up. I couldn't tell if it was a man or a woman, they were too far away, but the place went crazy with praise and people shouting. However, nothing was ever said about who it was or what was wrong with them, or if standing up was even something they couldn't do before. You just heard people saying someone got out of a wheelchair during the meeting. Not really an eyewitness that would hold up in court probably. These and many similar things were presented and practiced while claiming it was a continuation of the signs, wonders, and miracles we read about in the Bible. 

Let's step through the Bible and examine just what it is that is supposedly continuing today. The first of these Apostolic miracles are recorded in Acts 3:1-21 ESV

(1)  Now Peter and John were going up to the temple at the hour of prayer, the ninth hour.

(2)  And a man lame from birth was being carried, whom they laid daily at the gate of the temple that is called the Beautiful Gate to ask alms of those entering the temple.

(3)  Seeing Peter and John about to go into the temple, he asked to receive alms.

(4)  And Peter directed his gaze at him, as did John, and said, “Look at us.”

(5)  And he fixed his attention on them, expecting to receive something from them.

(6)  But Peter said, “I have no silver and gold, but what I do have I give to you. In the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, rise up and walk!”

(7)  And he took him by the right hand and raised him up, and immediately his feet and ankles were made strong.

(8)  And leaping up, he stood and began to walk, and entered the temple with them, walking and leaping and praising God.

(9)  And all the people saw him walking and praising God,

(10)  and recognized him as the one who sat at the Beautiful Gate of the temple, asking for alms. And they were filled with wonder and amazement at what had happened to him.

(11)  While he clung to Peter and John, all the people, utterly astounded, ran together to them in the portico called Solomon's.

(12)  And when Peter saw it he addressed the people: “Men of Israel, why do you wonder at this, or why do you stare at us, as though by our own power or piety we have made him walk?

(13)  The God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, the God of our fathers, glorified his servant Jesus, whom you delivered over and denied in the presence of Pilate, when he had decided to release him.

(14)  But you denied the Holy and Righteous One, and asked for a murderer to be granted to you,

(15)  and you killed the Author of life, whom God raised from the dead. To this we are witnesses.

(16)  And his name by faith in his name has made this man strong whom you see and know, and the faith that is through Jesus has given the man this perfect health in the presence of you all.

(17)  “And now, brothers, I know that you acted in ignorance, as did also your rulers.

(18)  But what God foretold by the mouth of all the prophets, that his Christ would suffer, he thus fulfilled.

(19)  Repent therefore, and turn back, that your sins may be blotted out,

(20)  that times of refreshing may come from the presence of the Lord, and that he may send the Christ appointed for you, Jesus,

(21)  whom heaven must receive until the time for restoring all the things about which God spoke by the mouth of his holy prophets long ago.

In the previous chapter Act 2:43, we are told in general that many signs and wonders were done by the hands of the apostles. From the many miracles which were performed, Luke selects one of which he gives a more full account, especially as it gives him occasion to record another of the addresses of Peter to the Jews. The point to be made here is the signs and wonders were done by the Apostles. It is very clear such miracles were limited to the Apostles and those to whom they ministered. The manner in which it is done is also noteworthy, it was spontaneous, unexpected, immediate, and with a very distinct purpose. It is also notable that Peter and John did not organize a healing meeting or a week-long miracle crusade. 

The man was not required to have any faith, he simply expected or hoped for a monetary gift. He didn't even know to ask for a miracle. Peter and John seemed unaware also and Luke uses the word "ἀτενίζω" (gaze) to describe the moment. It carries the meaning, "to gaze intently: - behold earnestly (steadfastly), fasten (eyes), look (earnestly, steadfastly, up steadfastly), set eyes." It is used by no other writer in the New Testament, except twice by Paul, 2Co 3:7, 2Co 3:13. In both those instances you get the idea of an extended look, it seems when the man asks for alms, Peter and John's attention was drawn and as they looked they became aware something was about to occur. After contemplating and understanding what they were to do, Peter takes action. It was done to a man who was well known in a local community whereby all present could testify to the truth of his condition from birth, and no one could suspect foul play.

Notice what happens next, everyone in the temple was utterly astounded and ran together to the portico with their cell phones to capture the momentous event! Well, not exactly, that would be today. Don't you think it is somewhat strange with these signs and wonders continuing so often today we are not seeing a lot of that?

The human mind, though brilliant in so many areas, seems to tend toward mysticism when confronted with the metaphysical. Though the mind processes faster than the speed of light and gives you a vision of the universe, those in the most advanced mathematics and other fields of higher study, find themselves falling prey to mysticism and the faith it produces in the most absurd understanding of metaphysical thought. With the world population estimated at around 8 billion, it is estimated 7 billion are associated with a religious affiliation. The human mind by a vast majority is compelled to look beyond itself to something greater. It has a compelling desire, (though brilliant in its studies) to either worship or to become a god or gods. As you are processing that thought, consider that includes you and me. It seems we are looking for God to speak to us, touch us in some way, and let us know He is real. As a result, we fall prey to mysticism reaching for anything we can grasp to affirm that desire. What God says to us or how He touches us it seems is at the mercy of our own imagination.

The Roman Catholic Church is said to have a rigid, formalized vetting process when evaluating miracles, which are defined as divine events that have no natural or scientific explanation. Investigating a single miracle could take years.

After a 14-year process, the Vatican released its verdict on a young boy’s sudden recovery from a debilitating gastrointestinal condition: It was determined to be a miracle. The doctors had tried everything: antibiotics, diets, and numerous tests. But it seemed nothing could stop the 4-year-old boy from literally wasting away in 1998. The doctors began to suspect cancer, and the boy’s mother, a devout Catholic, began looking outside of medicine for a cure. She asked nuns to pray for her son. She found two Nuns who knew what to do. They prayed and asked Mother Theresia Bonzel, a dead German nun who lived 100 years ago, to intervene. The nuns prayed a novena, which is a nine-day vigil, asking Bonzel to heal the boy. As soon as their novena was complete, (not nine days of continuous prayer, but a prayer said every day for 9 days) the boy woke up and his stomach no longer hurt him. The illness never returned. This certainly is a compelling story and confirms in the minds of many Catholics the reality of God and the practice of praying to dead saints.

On September 21, 1995, a most unusual religious event occurred. It was called the milk miracle and the experience cut across the entire social strata from the most simple of people to the most educated of doctors, lawyers, and engineers. The most ardent and consistent worshippers had the experience, as did those for whom religion meant little and God was a dim concept. 

Christians, Muslims, Sikhs, and atheists shared in having their offerings accepted by Lord Ganesha, who even obliged TV news cameras with live coverage in many countries. In Sanskrit, the "milk miracle" would be called "kshira chamatkara." All observed the miracle in speechless wonder. "It was like union with God," said one engineer. This was not the result of any mere human's entreaty. 

When a spoonful of milk from a bowl was held up to the trunk of the statue of Lord Ganesha, the milk would disappear, apparently taken in by the idol. Word of the event spread quickly, and by mid-morning, it was found that statues of the entire Hindu pantheon in temples all over India were drinking milk. The unprecedented incident caused even curious non-believers to rub shoulders with believers and even fanatics all standing in long queues outside the temples. Most of them returned with a sense of awe and reverence and a firm belief that, after all, there may be something called God up there! 

India's media outlets were not sure at first if such a thing should merit a place in their news release. However,  they soon found themselves convinced that it was in fact true and so, newsworthy from every angle. Never before in history has a simultaneous miracle occurred on such a global scale. Television stations such as CNN and the BBC, radio, and newspapers (among them The Washington Post, The New York Times, The Guardian, and Daily Express) eagerly covered this unique phenomenon, and even skeptical journalists held their milk-filled spoons to the statues of gods and watched as the milk disappeared. A very compelling story and this time it establishes the practice of praying to Ganesha as well as any number of idols and serves for confirmation as a touch from the gods.

On June 1997, according to a reporter from the Express newspaper, UK, they were calling it the Miracle Tomato of Huddersfield. For when a schoolgirl sliced it in half she found written inside what thousands believe to be a message from God.  A young Muslim girl 14, was astounded to see the words, spelled out in Arabic, "There is only one God" and "Mohammed is the messenger" in the veins of each segment.

More than 50 worshippers a day were making a pilgrimage from all over Britain to see the wonderful tomato. And the shop which sold it did a roaring trade in the fruit since the find on that Sunday afternoon. The young girl made the discovery as she helped her grandparents prepare a salad at their terraced home in Lockwood, Huddersfield.

She paid about 60 pence for a bag of tomatoes on a trip to a store across the road with her cousin, also 14. When She returned she cut up the first two tomatoes into small pieces. But she took a third from the brown paper bag, and something made her stop. She turned to her grandfather who was 68, and asked: "Which way shall I cut the tomato, granddad?" After following his instructions the miracle was discovered. I am sure today, the impact of this event upon such a young mind is still a great confirmation to her and all who witnessed it of the Muslim faith. 

It appears miracles even happen outside of religious context, on October 27, 2015, A 3-year-old girl who was pronounced dead after a fever woke up a day later in a coffin, during her funeral ceremony. Police confirmed the incredible incident to the Philippine media outlet, after footage of the child seemingly rising from the dead at the funeral service in Bayabas went viral over the weekend. Citing accounts of the girl’s parents, the Police Senior Inspector said the toddler was taken to a local hospital on Friday after suffering a severe fever. He stated, “During that time, the attending clinic personnel and physician confirmed that the young patient had no more pulse and was clinically dead last Saturday morning about 9 a.m.,”. She was discovered to be alive when a funeral attendee removed the cover of the girl’s coffin and saw her head move. The parents immediately gave the girl water and rushed her to a clinic for a check-up. It was not mentioned if the family was affiliated with any particular religion or not. If they were, I'm sure this is confirmation of the truth of their faith and that whatever god they serve is the real god. If they were not, there was an opportunity open for someone to witness to them they were praying for her, and god (whichever one they happen to hold to) had answered their prayer and raised her from the dead. 

I present these accounts with much sensitivity to illustrate the danger of mysticism and the great confusion it brings with it. Opportunity for Confirmation Bias abounds. Confirmation Bias is the tendency to look for information that supports, rather than rejects, one’s preconceptions, typically by interpreting evidence to confirm existing beliefs while rejecting or ignoring any conflicting data. 

It seems we may be fashioning ourselves like many eastern religions looking for an experience with God through our emotional and sensory facilities. These facilities are not trustworthy, one psychological publication states, "there are deeply religious people who want to hear gods and spirits speak and cannot and atheists who report anomalous sensory events nearly indistinguishable from religious experiences". They would further explain by saying, "The central claim of this paper is that cultural models of the mind and personal orientations toward the mind shape people’s phenomenological experiences and their interpretations of these experiences in ways that manifest as cultural and individual differences in reports of spiritual presence events." 

In other words, mysticism. The Gospel and mysticism are to have no relation with each other. Many observe these phenomena and conclude all religions are basically the same, that perhaps there is a great something out there trying to communicate with us. Of course that leaves you not knowing what or who. For the Christian, all are clearly defined for us in the Scriptures. However, what God tells us in His word and what we may feel He is telling us through our human intuition are two completely different things. What we "feel" God wants us to do and what He actually tells us to do in His word may or may not agree. However, the only sure word is Scripture alone. The one major distinction in the miracles above is in the direction they take the mind. Only the Biblical account of Peter and John points you to the Gospel, all the others point you to mysticism and experience. Perhaps science has an answer to the phenomenons that presented themselves in each case but that is not the point. The Bible is about the Gospel from beginning to end, it is the running theme that builds from the fall to the consummation. The miracles in the Bible present their timing and purpose in such a way as to direct your mind toward what is being said as well as validate what is stated. Concealed in this framework the Biblical miracles are chasms apart from any other extraordinary phenomena or so-called miracles that may occur. We will continue to look at the Biblical miracles in the next post and I think you can see a clear distinction between them and what we are seeing today.   

2 Peter 1:19 KJV

(19)  We have also a more sure word of prophecy; whereunto ye do well that ye take heed, as unto a light that shineth in a dark place, until the day dawn, and the day star arise in your hearts:

David

A look at Spiritual Gifts

The topic of cessationism vs continuationism is still debated in today's theological arena. It began as early as the second century with...